They eliminated the rangefinder from the X-E1, which was to the dismay of some, but to others it was unnecessary, and the drop in price that accompanied the X-E1 was very interesting for those wishing to have a professional grade system in yet a less expensive option. In fact, Fujifilm left the same sensor (16.3 MP) in the X-E1, complete without the anti-aliasing filter, giving these sensors excellent sharpness. I found the relative weight of the system more than friendly when maneuvering around a product shot quickly.įujifilm released the X-E1 after the X-Pro 1 and many found the specs to be similar. The bokeh of the 1.4 is excellent for portrait and product alike. In addition, the f/1.4 on these lenses is an additional plus for the whole system: the possibility of such a wide aperture suddenly gives the system an extra professional advantage. Examined at 100% and even 200% in Lightroom has been astounding. The sharpness of the 35mm lens has been phenomenal on a series of food photographs that I was shooting for personal work. When shooting RAW, the camera allows you down to an ISO of 200, but I had not seen much noise up through 800 or so. It seems to handle the low light very low, and I have noticed less need to smooth over dark areas that traditionally had noise in them on previous sensors. Under controlled lighting, the X-Pro 1 is as good as any APS-C sensor out there. The 1.4 allowed me to shoot like I was on my 1.2 from other manufacturers and portraits and food photography continued to have an awesome bokeh. I think my choice to buy the 35mm initially was a good one, as it gave me a standard lens (about the look of a 50 mm on a full frame camera) with a shallow depth of field (1.4 at its maximum aperture). Fujifilm has announced a 14mm and an additional zoom lens to this lineup, hopefully signaling that they will continue to produce the cameras with these mounts. The 18 mm f/2.0 seems perfectly adequate to me (although other have rated it slightly less sharp than its brothers). Fujifilm has put out some really excellent glass, with the 35mm and the 60mm providing sharp images comparable to the highest professional grade lenses of its competitors. With a light, small body, the X-Pro 1 doesn't appear to be the obvious professional camera, which often requires large, heavy lenses. In photographing studio product, food photography, street photography, and portraits, the X-Pro 1 did as good as a job as my other digital cameras. Basically, I could use it in almost any case, except those that needed high speed focusing. ![]() I started to use the camera more and more in place of my dSLR (when I could). ![]() I did love the image quality from the camera and the 35mm fixed lens. The f/1.4 on the 35 is killer, and I was getting very professional images coming off the camera from everything from outdoor to studio images. I was pretty intrigued by this, considering the photographer was doing some high-quality studio work. I noticed that one photographer who was shooting product and portraits claimed to move exclusively to the X-Pro 1 for all of his professional work. Admittedly, it sat around for a bit while I continued to use my DSLR for many projects. I really bought it because it looked awesome with its metal body and killer retro appearance. I bought the Fujifilm X-Pro 1 after reading many-a-review on its high-quality images from its APS-C sensor and its 35mm or 60mm lenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |